Aircraft
Location & Date
Photographer
Distinct Views: 1,432,708
Photo Added: November 16, 2007
Photo Added: November 16, 2007
Explore Other Great Photos
Photo Albums Containing This Photo
Album
Views
Likes
Photos
Updated
Views
3.5M
Likes
4
Photos
196K
Updated
57 minutes ago
Views
1.5M
Likes
0
Photos
139.9K
Updated
38 minutes ago
Views
1.2M
Likes
5
Photos
7.9K
Updated
1 hour ago
Views
985.4K
Likes
3
Photos
9.2K
Updated
1 hour ago
Photo Copyright © Zubova Marina. All rights reserved. Airliners.net is not affiliated with any entity mentioned or pictured herein.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Comments (164)
i wonder who is paying for the damage, and if airbus will give a new a40 to Etihad
Sorry for A'Bus and the injured guys, lessons learnt we hope
Paul
I thought this bird was a scrap photo on the thumbnail.. Hope the people injured come out okay. All I can say is, good timing.
--Veeshal
Who's next?
Get well soon to all injured employees.
As for the comment below "That's why boeing is king"... It's a pity that in this person's mind, Boeing (spelt with a capital letter by the way) stands much taller on the debris of other aircraft - The world is big enough for both...
Surely the Airbus/Boeing debate should remain light-hearted and encourage excellent aircraft design & healthy competitiveness across the world, not descend into sneering and laughing at other people's mistakes and injuries. It's possible this was an accident caused by 'human error', not the aircraft itself.
Any accident that a person can walk away from is the best type, and I for one, wish them a speedy recovery.
I think at least 2 or 3 engines, tail, APU or wings are savageable..
then a boeing!!
Those people talking about jumping the chocks: Two recent telex messages from Airbus have stated that this aircraft was NOT chocked (confirmed), contrary to procedures. Second Airbus states that all four engines were running at high power (EPR 1.24-1.26, confirmed) which again is contrary to procedures stating only one engine at a time (plus a little power on the other wing for symmetry).
Also the late response time to retard to idle was pointed out: 9 seconds from initial movement. The crew were aware of movement, since after 2 seconds they pressed brakes manually and released parking brake, appearantly leaving the engines at high power at this stage.
It is not clear who had responsability for the run; Airbus is not confirming that it is them. There was Etihad staff present so it is possibly them (unconfirmed). For sure, some people are going to be in some heavy reviews about this.
It didn't even get to carry a single person (besides Airbus). I'm just glad no one was hurt.
it's too bad that in 2 weeks the same airplane crashed. I just hope this doesn't happen to another airplane!
Great shot!!!
But the shot is still cool
To answer a question/comment below, usually (always) there is at least one person in the cockpit to 'rev' the engines.
Airplane damage:Destroyed
Airplane fate: Written off (damaged beyond repair)
"The wheels were not chocked when the crew started engine and brake tests at 15:19"
Why did they use the parking brake instead of disengage it and use the pedals?! Major error any way.
why not a a380. they're ugly. not the beautiFul one!!!
That was a bit stupid though because
it plummeted straight into it on
landing before ripping the Cockpit!
Looks like a sad day for the
Pilots.
expensive error there.